Forecasting and prediction

    For-profit institutions, or proprietary schools, are educational organizations intending to generate profit for their owners or shareholders (Morse, 2015). They differ from traditional non-profit institutions in that their primary purpose is not solely to provide education but also to generate revenue (Cellini, 2021). For-profit institutions have a long history in the United States, dating back to the 19th century, and have experienced significant growth in recent decades (Tucker, 2021a). This paper will analyze the history, issues, and current trends of for-profit institutions in higher education.

History of For-Profit Institutions in Higher Education 

    For-profit institutions have a long history in the United States, dating back to the 19th century when trade schools and business colleges were established to meet the growing demand for vocational education (Coleman & Vedder, 2008). In the 1970s and 1980s, for-profit institutions saw a significant expansion, partly driven by the increasing cost of traditional non-profit colleges and universities and the growing demand for postsecondary education. As per Tucker (2021b), The growth of for-profit institutions continued in the 1990s and 2000s, with the rise of online education and the increased flexibility it offered students. In addition, Hodgman (2018) found that other factors, such as a favorable business environment, a business model that responds quickly to the job market, and the ineffectiveness of traditional institutions in providing career-oriented education, have favored the growth of For-Profit institutions.

    For-profit institutions are situated within the higher education framework as they offer postsecondary education programs and degrees, just like traditional non-profit institutions. They are accredited by recognized accrediting bodies and provide a range of programs, from certificates and diplomas to associate bachelor's and master's degrees (Kinser, 2005). Some for-profit institutions also offer doctoral programs (Dos Santos, 2020). They follow the same basic educational structure as traditional institutions, including classroom instruction, laboratory work, and assessments such as exams and assignments. Additionally, for-profit institutions often offer flexible scheduling options, such as evening and weekend classes or online courses, catering to non-traditional students' needs (Engler, 2020). By providing these programs and services, for-profit institutions situate themselves within the framework of higher education and play a role in helping to meet the growing demand for postsecondary education. 

Issues with For-Profit Institutions in Higher Education 

    Despite their growth and popularity, for-profit institutions have recently faced significant criticism and controversy. One of the main issues is their high cost compared to traditional non-profit institutions (Morse, 2015). Many for-profit institutions charge significantly higher tuition rates, which can result in students taking on large amounts of debt (Armona et al., 2022). 

    Another issue with for-profit institutions is their accountability and transparency. Some for-profit institutions have been accused of making false or misleading statements about their academic programs, job placement rates, and other vital aspects of their operations (Schade, 2014). There have also been concerns about the role of for-profit institutions in the student loan debt crisis, with some institutions accused of preying on low-income and vulnerable students and encouraging them to take on large amounts of debt (Gross et al., 2010).

Current Trends in For-Profit Institutions in Higher Education 

Despite these challenges, for-profit institutions remain an important part of higher education. One of the current trends in for-profit institutions is the increasing focus on online education (Cheslock & Jaquette, 2022). Many for-profit institutions offer a range of online programs and courses, providing students with greater flexibility and convenience (Xu & Xu, 2019). Additionally, many for-profit institutions partner with traditional non-profit institutions to offer joint programs or transfer agreements, providing students with additional options for continuing their education. 

    Another trend in for-profit institutions is the growing focus on workforce development and vocational education. Many for-profit institutions offer programs and courses specifically designed to meet the needs of local employers, providing students with the skills and knowledge they need to succeed in the workforce (Deming et al., 2013). 

Conclusion 

    For-profit institutions have a long history in higher education and continue to be an essential part of the educational landscape in the United States. Despite their challenges, including high costs, low-quality programs, and accountability issues, for-profit institutions remain popular for students seeking postsecondary education. With a growing focus on online education and workforce development, for-profit institutions are well-positioned to meet the changing needs of students and employers in the years to come. I chose For-Profit institutions for two reasons. First, I pursued my higher education in for-profit institutions, and with all the scrutiny, I sought to understand the differences between traditional institutions and for-profit. Another reason is that I currently work for a profit institution. 

References 

Armona, L., Chakrabarti, R., & Lovenheim, M. F. (2022). Student debt and default: The role of for-profit colleges. Journal of Financial Economics, 144(1), 67–92. 

https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JFINECO.2021.12.008 

Cellini, S. (2021). For-Profit Colleges in the United States: Insights from Two Decades of 

Research. https://doi.org/10.26300/bbna-vh38 

Cheslock, J. J., & Jaquette, O. (2022). Concentrated or Fragmented? The U.S. Market for Online 

Higher Education. Research in Higher Education, 63(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162- 

021-09639-7 

Coleman, J., & Vedder, R. (2008). For-Profit Education in the United States: A Primer. Center 

for College Affordability and Productivity (NJ1). www.collegeaffordability.net 

Deming, D., Goldin, C., & Katz, L. (2013). For-Profit Colleges. The Future of Children, 23(1), 

137–163. https://doi.org/10.1353/FOC.2013.0005 

dos Santos, L. M. (2020). How do for-profit colleges and universities maintain enrolment rates to continue their financial health. Journal of Education and E-Learning Research, 7(1). 

https://doi.org/10.20448/journal.509.2020.71.69.75 

Engler, A. (2020). Non-traditional students in higher education. Hungarian Educational 

Research Journal, 9(3). https://doi.org/10.1556/063.9.2019.3.45 

Gross, J. P. K., Cekic, O., Hossler, D., & Hillman, N. (2010). What Matters in Student Loan 

Default: A Review of the Research Literature. Journal of Student Financial Aid, 39(1). 

https://doi.org/10.55504/0884-9153.1032 

Hodgman, M. R. (2018). Understanding For-Profit Higher Education in the United States 

Through History, Criticism, and Public Policy: A Brief Sector Landscape Synopsis. Journal 

of Educational Issues, 4(2), 1. https://doi.org/10.5296/JEI.V4I2.13302 

Kinser, K. (2005). A profile of regionally accredited for-profit institutions of higher education. 

New Directions for Higher Education, 2005(129). https://doi.org/10.1002/he.173 

Morse, S. N. (2015). For-profit schools: a history of abuse and the need for reform. Brigham 

Young University Education & Law Journal, 50(2). 

Schade, S. A. (2014). Reining in the Predatory Nature of for-Profit Colleges, 56 Ariz. In Arizona Law Review (Vol. 56, Issue 1). 

Tucker, F. (2021a). For-Profit Colleges: Neither Educationally nor Economically Equivalent. 

Research in Higher Education Journal, 40. http://www.aabri.com/copyright.html 

Tucker, F. (2021b). For-Profit Colleges: Neither Educationally nor Economically Equivalent. 

Research in Higher Education Journal, 40. http://www.aabri.com/copyright.html 

Xu, D., & Xu, Y. (2019). The Promises and Limits of Online Higher Education. American 

Enterprise Institute.